Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLC
Supreme Court of Connecticut · No. SC19832, SC19833
👎Unfavorable to gun rights
allowed a marketing suit against the rifle's makers to proceed past PLCAA immunity
GunMapUSA assessment of the outcome's direction, not a statement that the court decided rightly or wrongly.
What the court held
Plaintiffs connected to the Sandy Hook shooting sued the manufacturer, distributor, and seller of the Bushmaster XM15-E2S rifle under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, alleging that wrongful marketing of the rifle was a substantial factor in the killings. The Connecticut Supreme Court held that CUTPA qualifies as a predicate statute under the PLCAA's predicate exception, so the wrongful-marketing claims are not preempted and may go forward. Three justices dissented in part, reading the exception to reach only statutes governing the sale and marketing of firearms specifically.
Summarized from the court's opinion.
What this case is about
whether the PLCAA bars state unfair-trade-practices claims over the marketing of a rifle
GunMapUSA summary of the issue, not a quotation from the court.
Key Dates
- 2019-03-19 — Decided
Sources
- CourtListener — retrieved 2026-08-08
Summary of public court records. Not legal advice.