Barris, J. v. Stroud Twp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2022-07-06 · No. 363 MAL 2021 (Granted)

The complete text of the court's opinion, 100 words, reproduced in full. Judicial opinions are not subject to copyright — see Banks v. Manchester, 128 U.S. 244 (1888) and Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 590 U.S. 255 (2020).

Text obtained from CourtListener. We publish it unedited; typographic artefacts from the original conversion are left as they are rather than silently corrected. For the authoritative version, use the court's own copy.

Our summary and the case history · Source on CourtListener

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

JONATHAN BARRIS, : No. 68 MAP 2022 : Appellee : : : v. : : : STROUD TOWNSHIP, : : Appellant :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2022, the briefing directives contained in the

Court’s June 6, 2022 order are hereby VACATED, and the parties are DIRECTED to

address the question presented under the standards announced in N.Y. Rifle & Pistol

Assoc., Inc. v. Bruen, ___ S.Ct. ___, 2022 WL 2251305 (June 23, 2022).

Justice Brobson did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

← Back to the case